Keefektifan pendekatan kontekstual berbasis budaya lokal ditinjau dari prestasi, minat belajar, dan apresiasi terhadap matematika

Eka Sulistyawati

Abstract


Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan kontekstual berbasis budaya lokal dan pendekatan konstekstual dalam pembelajaran matematika dan pendekatan pembelajaran yang lebih efektif  diantara pendekatan  kontekstual dan pendekatan kontekstual berbasis budaya lokal ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, minat belajar dan apresiasi siswa terhadap matematika. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan pretest-posttest control group design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 4 Girimulyo yang memiliki karakteristik yang sama. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 2 kelas yang dipilih secara acak dari seluruh populasi. Data hasil penelitian dianalisis menggunakan Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) untuk mengidentifikasi perbedaan keefektifan antara pendekatan kontekstual berbasis budaya lokal dan pendekatan kontekstual. Untuk mengetahui pendekatan yang lebih efektif diantara pendekatan kontekstual berbasis budaya lokal dan pendekatan kontekstual data dianalisis menggunakan univariate independent sample t-test. Untuk mengetahui keefektifan pembelajaran matematika menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual berbasis budaya lokal dan pendekatan kontekstual digunakan uji proporsi. Hasil penelitian ini adalah 1) Pendekatan kontekstual berbasis budaya lokal lebih efektif  ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika, minat belajar dan apresiasi siswa terhadap matematika; 2) Pendekatan kontekstual efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan apresiasi siswa terhadap matematika; 3)  Pendekatan kontekstual berbasis budaya lokal lebih efektif dibandingkan pendekatan kontekstual ditinjau dari apresiasi siswa terhadap matematika. 

 

This study aims to describe the effectiveness of teaching mathematics using contextual based on local culture approach and contextual approach and the more effective teaching between contextual based on local culture approach and contextual approach based on student achievement, learning interest, and students appreciation toward mathematics. This research is a quasi-experimental design with nonequivalent groups pretest-posttest control group design. The research population are all of year VIII students that have same characteristic with students in SMP Negeri 4 Girimulyo. The sample consisted of two classes that were randomly established from SMP Negeri 4 Girimulyo. The data were analyzed by means of Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) to determine the differences in the effectiveness between the first experimental class and second experimental class, continued with univariate independent sample t-test to see if the contextual based on local culture approach is more effective than contextual approach. To test the effectiveness of mathematics teaching using contextual based on local culture approach and contextual approach, a proportion test was used. The results of the study shows that: 1) the contextual based on local culture approach are effective in teaching mathematics based on students’ learning achievement, students’ learning interest and appreciation toward mathematics; 2) the contextual approach are effective in teaching mathematics based on students’ learning achievement and appreciation toward mathematics; 3) the contextual based on local culture approach is more effective than contextual approach based on students' appreciation toward mathematics.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Barret, T. (2007). Teaching toward appreciation in the visual arts. In (L. Bresler, Ed.), International handbook of research of arts education . New York, NY: Springer.

Cai, J., Kaiser, G., Perry, B., & Wong, N. (2009). Effective mathematics teaching from teachers’ perpectives: national and cross-national studies. Rotterdam, NL: Sense.

Center for Occupational Research and Development. (1999). Teaching mathematics contextually. Waco, TX: CORD Communications.

Collette, A.T. & Chiappetta, E.L. (1994). Science instructional in the middle and secondary schools (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.

Crawford, M.L. (2001). Teaching contextually: research, rationale, and techniques for improving student motivation and achievement in mathematics and science. Waco, TX: CCI Publishing. Retrieved from https://dcmathpathways.org/resources/teaching-contextually-research-rationale-and-techniques-improving-student-motivation-and

Deal, T.E., & Peterson, K.D. (1999). Shaping school culture: the heart of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Elliot, S.N., Kratochwill, T.R., & Cook, J.L. (2000). Educational psychology: effective teaching, effective learning (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Frenzel, A.C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H.M.G. (2010). Development of Mathematics Interest in Adolescence: Influences of Gender, Family, and School Context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507-537. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x

Johnson, E.B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: what it is and why it’s here to stay. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Kamaruddin, N.K.Md, Ahmad, W.M.R.W., Amin, Z.Md, & Alias, M. (2011). A study of the effectiveness of the contextual approach to teaching and learning statistics at the universiti tun hussein onn malaysia (UTHM). International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 4(25), 305-313. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/aa6189aa1d4245a1986b28d9443379c5/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=626342

Kisker, E.E., Lipka, J., Adams, B.L., Rickard, A., Andrew-Ihrke, D., Yanez, E.E., & Millard, A. (2012). The potential of a culturally based supplemental mathematics curriculum to improve the mathematics performance of Alaska native and other students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 43(1), 75-113. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/Publications/journal-for-research-in-mathematics-education/

Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar ilmu antropologi (Rev.ed). Jakarta, Indonesia: Rineka Cipta.

Köller, O., Baumert, J & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for reasearch in mathematics education, 32(5), 448-470. doi: 10.2307/749801

McMillan, J.H. & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

Ormrod, J.E. (2008). Educational psychology: developing learners (6th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Reys, R., Lindquist, M., Lambdin, D.V., & Smith, N.L. (2014). Helping children learn mathematics (14th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Schunk, D.H., Meece, J.L., & Pintrich, P.R. (2020). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Sears, S.J. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: A primer for effective instruction. Bloominton, IN: Phi Delta Kappa International.

Stevens, J.P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Suherman Ar., E., Turmudi, Suryadi, D., Herman, T., Suhendra, Prabawanto, S., … Rohayati, A. (2003). Common textbook Strategi pembelajaran matematika kontemporer (Rev. Ed.). Bandung, Indonesia: JICA UPI.

Vispoel, W.P., & Austin, J.R. (1995). Success and failure in junior high school: A critical incident approach to understanding students’ attributional beliefs. American Educational Journal, 32(2), 377-412. doi: 10.3102/00028312032002377

Williams, D. (2007). The What, why, and how of contextual teaching in a mathematics classroom. Mathematics Teacher. 100(8), 572-575. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/Publications/mathematics-teacher

Woolfolk, A. (2009). Educational psychology: Active learning edition (10th ed.) (H.P. Soetjipto & S.M. Soetjipto, trans.). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zahman, A. (2012). Keefektifan pendekatan kontekstual dan pendekatan pemecahan masalah pada pembelajaran matematika ditinjau dari pencapaian kompetensi dasar, kemampuan penalaran, dan komunikasi matematika.Tesis Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/jp3m.v6i1.1421

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



©2017 JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika)
Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan 
Universitas Siliwangi
Jl. Siliwangi No. 24 Kota Tasikmalaya - 46115
email: jp3m@unsil.ac.id
e-ISSN: 2581-2807 ; p-ISSN: 2460-8599


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
StatCounter:
WebAnalytics Made Easy - StatCounter
Detail


Diindex oleh:
Sinta DOAJ BASE - Bielefeld Academich Search Engine ROAD CiteFactor DRJI Indexed Journal Moraref One Search