Analisis Daya Saing Renewable Energy dan Fossil Energy (Studi pada Ekspor Batu Bara dan Biodiesel Indonesia)

Friska Lusiyana, Rizki Maulana Prasetyo

Abstract


The production for renewable energy and fossil energy simultaneously has significant growth in advance. The fossil energy which includes Indonesia’s coal production legitimately has a significant effect on global energy demand. and impacts in export segmentation. Indonesia is the biggest coal exporter in the world. This condition simultaneously interprets significant effects on coal export. In order to reduce emission and supporting green economy, coal significantly impacted, Indonesia has not given significant effect on comparative advantages with RSCA methods and only indicate s positive coherency in 2007 and 2008. The policy to maintain coal production and export has significant nexus, Its impact to the coherency between demand for export and production policy has not interpreted alteration on global demand. In Biodiesel, Indonesia has a significant effect from 2012 to 2021 by measuring the RSCA. Adequately, this prominent form of renewable energy would give sustainable energy and replace the petrodiesel in the world. Indonesia has comparative advantages towards biodiesel’s biodiesel exporter country. Biodiesel would be an adequate replacement for fossil energy and renewable energy in the future for zero emission in 2045.

Produksi energi terbarukan dan energi fosil secara menyeluruh memberikan hasil yang signifikan dalam pengembangannya. Energi fosil yang disubstitusikan dalam komoditas batu bara Indonesia memiliki dampak yang signifikan pada permintaan global dan memiliki dampak dengan permintaan dalam komoditas energi. Kondisi ini secara menyeluruh menginterpretasikan efek yang signifikan pada ekspor batu bara. Indonesia adalah eksportir terbesar komoditas batu bara. Implementasi pergerakan untuk mengurangi emisi global dan ekonomi hijau, komoditas batu bara berdampak secara signifikan. Indonesia tidak memiliki keunggulan komparatif dengan analisis menggunakan RSCA, Indonesia hanya memiliki keunggulan komparatif pada tahun 2007 dan 2008. Kebijakan untuk melindungi dan menjaga produksi dan ekspor batu bara memiliki korelasi yang signifikan. Hal tersebut berdampak pada koherensitas permintaan ekspor dan kebijakan untuk memproduksi batu bara yang tidak sesuai dengan permintaan pasar. Pada komoditas biodiesel, Indonesia memiliki hasil yang signifikan pada tahun 2012 sampai tahun 2021 dengan mengukur tingkat RSCA. Dalam konteks yang sama, penggunaan petrodiesel dapat tergantikan dengan biodiesel di dunia. Indonesia memiliki keunggulan komparatif pada ekspor biodiesel dibandingkan dengan negara eksportir terbesar lainnya. Biodiesel juga dapat mendukung zero emission pada tahun 2045 dan menggantikan energi fosil.


Keywords


Batu Bara; Biodiesel; Energi Terbarukan; Energi Fosil.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amiti, M. (1999). Specialization patterns in Europe. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 135, 573–593.

Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1994). Aggregate convergence and sectoral specialization in innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4, 17–33.

Ballance, R., Forstner, H., & Murray, T. (1985). On measuring revealed comparative advantage: a note on Bowen’s indices. Weltwirtschaftliches Arhiv, 121, 346–350.

Amiti, M. (1999). Specialization patterns in Europe. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 135, 573–593.

Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1994). Aggregate convergence and sectoral specialization in innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4, 17–33.

Ballance, R., Forstner, H., & Murray, T. (1985). On measuring revealed comparative advantage: a note on Bowen’s indices. Weltwirtschaftliches Arhiv, 121, 346–350.

BP Statistical. (2022). BP Statistical Review of World Energy., 3. Retrieved from https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2022-full-report.pdf (2022).

Cahyono, T. D., Coto, Z. and Febrianto, F. (2008) “Analisis Nilai Kalor dan Kelayakan Ekonomis Kayu Sebagai Bahan Bakar Substitusi Batu bara Di Pabrik Semen,†Forum Pascasarjana, 31(2). Available at: http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/forumpasca/ article/view/5043/3463.

Böhringer C., Xaquin G-M, Cazcarro, I., & Iñaki Arto. (2017). The efficiency cost of protective measures in climate policy. Energy Policy, 104, 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.007

Dalum, B., Laursen, K., & Verspagen, B. (1999). Does specialization matter for growth? Industrial and Corporate Change, 8, 267–288.

Guo, M. (2015). Bioenergy and biofuels: History, status, and perspective. 42, 713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.013.

Hannah, R. (2021). Global CO2 Emissions From Fossil Fuels. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022.

Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. (2011). The network structure of economic output. Journal of Economic Growth, 16, 309–342.

Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Baraba´si, A.-L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317, 482–487.

Laursen, K., & Drejer, I. (1999). Do inter-sectoral linkages matter for international export specialisation? The Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 311–330.

Laursen, K. (2000). Trade specialisation, technology and growth: theory and evidence from advanced countries. Cheltenham, UK and Lyme, US: Edward Elgar.

Li, H., Huang, J., Hu, Y., Wang, S., Liu, J., & Yang, L. (2021). A new TMY generation method based on the entropy-based TOPSIS theory for different climatic zones in China. Energy, 231, 120723–120723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120723

Mahmood, A., & Charles O.P. Marpaung. (2014). Carbon pricing and energy efficiency improvement -- why to miss the interaction for developing economies? An illustrative CGE based application to the Pakistan case. Energy Policy, 67, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.072

Malerba, F., & Montobbio, F. (2003). Exploring factors affecting international technological specialization: the role of knowledge flows and the structure of innovative activity. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 411–434.

Meliciani, V. (2002). The impact of technological specialisation on national performance in a balance-ofpayments-constrained growth model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 13, 101–118.

Wang, Z.-X., Zheng, H., Pei, L.-L., & Tong, J. (2017). Decomposition of the factors influencing export fluctuation in China’s new energy industry based on a constant market share model. Energy Policy, 109, 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.050

Zhao, Y. (2011). The Study of Effect of Carbon Tax on the International Competitiveness of Energy-intensive Industries: An Empirical Analysis of OECD 21 Countries, 1992-2008. Energy Procedia, 5, 1291–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.225




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/wlfr.v4i1.6289

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 WELFARE Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

                                                                                                             ____ ____

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

WELFARE Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi by Jurusan Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Siliwangi
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Based on work at https://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/welfare/index
 
WELFARE Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Visitor Counter Welfare Stat