Grammatical Cohesion Devices of Hortatory Exposition Texts Used on Senior High School Textbook: A Critical Pedagogy Analysis

Sarah Nadia Nirmala Putri, Andi Rustandi, Misbahudin Misbahudin

Abstract


This research identifies the grammatical cohesion devices of hortatory exposition texts used on senior high school textbook. A descriptive qualitative method was employed in conducting the study. It was aimed to find out (1) types of grammatical cohesion devices realized on hortatory exposition texts of senior high school textbook, (2) the extent to which grammatical cohesion devices help the texts achieve their cohesion, (3) the pedagogical benefits of hortatory exposition texts taken from senior high school textbook after being analyzed by grammatical cohesion devices viewed from the critical pedagogy philosophies. There are five hortatory exposition texts that were analyzed by using the cohesion taxonomy as suggested by Halliday & Hasan (1976). The findings revealed that the total use of grammatical cohesion devices in five hortatory exposition texts were different. The first text showed the small use of reference, substitution, ellipsis, and conjunction, it was counted 39 items found in the first text. Meanwhile the use of grammatical cohesion devices in the third text was the highest, it was counted 148. Moreover, it was also proved that those devices could helped the text achieved their cohesion. The writer also summed up that hortatory exposition texts from textbook were beneficial for the students and it was appropriate with critical pedagogy principles.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akindele, J. (2011). Cohesive devices in selected esl academic papers. African Nebula, 3, 99-112. Retrieved from : http://nobleworld.biz/images/Akindele_AN3.pdf

Bahaziq, A. (2016). Cohesive devices in written discourse: a discourse analysis of a student’s essay writing. English Language Teaching, 9(7), 112-119. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.3p.129

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York, USA: The McGraw-hill Companies Inc.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London UK: Longman Group Limited London.

Heigham, J., & Croker R. A. (2009). Qulitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Giroux, H. A. (1991). Giroux’s Principles of Critical Pedagogy. Retrieved from : http://www.public.iastate.edu/~rhetoric/105H18/pedagogy/principlespage.html

Michael, A.S., Muthusamy, C., Suppiah, P, C., Joseph, C., & Masturina, S. (2013). Cohesion in news articles: A discourse analysis approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 2(3):129-133. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.3p.129

Nurhayati, A., & Aswandi. (2014). Implementing interactive reading model to teach hortatory exposition text to the eleventh graders of SMAN 1 Sooko Mojokerto. E-journal UNESA, 1(1), 1-9. Retrieved from : http://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/retain/article/view/6359

Rustandi, A., Ani. (2017). Gender differences in teacher – students interactions in an Efl classroom of islamic junior high school in Indonesia. International Journal of English and Education. 6(3), 153-164.

Rashidi, N., & Safari, F. (2011). A model for efl materials development within the framework of critical pedagogy (cp). English Language Teaching, 4(2), 250-259. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n2p250




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/jspendidikan.v4i2.530

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





©2015 JURNAL SILIWANGI: Seri Pendidikan
Lembaga Penelitian, Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan (LP2M-PMP) Universitas Siliwangi
Jl. Siliwangi No. 24 Kota Tasikmalaya - 46115
email: jspendidikan@unsil.ac.id


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License