Analisis Performa Segment Routing dan Reactive Routing pada Software-defined Networking

Lutfi Kiki Fuadi

Abstract

Software-defined Networking (SDN) is a new paradigm in computer network management that separates the control plane and data plane. The controller is an important component in an SDN-based computer network. The purpose of this research is to conduct a comparative study of the performance of segment routing and reactive routing in SDN. In this study, ONOS was chosen as the controller used in the experiment because it supports the implementation of segment routing and reactive routing. The experiment of implementing the two routing protocols on an SDN network with a full-mesh and tree (depth 5) network topology is the scenario that is tried in this study. QoS results based on TIPHON parameters (throughput, packet loss, delay and jitter) were recorded from each experiment. The throughput of each experiment was 6.97 MB/s, 5.80 MB/s, 1.65 ms and 2.16 ms, indicating index 4 (very good). Packet loss in the full-mesh topology experiment was 5.16% and 5.53% with index 3 (good), while in tree (depth 5) the results were 2.46% and 2.16% showed index 4 (very good). The delay for each experiment was 2.99 ms, 3.17 ms, 4.65 ms and 5.43 ms, indicating an index of 4 (very good). The jitter for each experiment was 7.10 ms, 7.85 ms, 18.30 ms and 18.13 ms, indicating index 3 (good).

Full Text:

PDF (66-71)

References

A. Hakiri, A. Gokhale, P. Berthou, D. C. Schmidt, and T. Gayraud, “Software-defined networking: Challenges and research opportunities for future internet,†Comput. Networks, vol. 75, no. PartA, pp. 453–471, 2014.

M. Jammal, T. Singh, A. Shami, R. Asal, and Y. Li, “Software defined networking: State of the art and research challenges,†Comput. Networks, vol. 72, pp. 74–98, 2014.

M. Z. Masoud, Y. Jaradat, and I. Jannoud, “On preventing ARP poisoning attack utilizing Software Defined Network (SDN) paradigm,†2015 IEEE Jordan Conf. Appl. Electr. Eng. Comput. Technol. AEECT 2015, pp. 0–4, 2015.

S. Kaur, K. Kaur, and V. Gupta, “Implementing Static Router based on Software Defined Networking,†2016 Int. Conf. Comput. Tech. Inf. Commun. Technol. ICCTICT 2016 - Proc., pp. 358–360, 2016.

D. Satasiya and D. Raviya Rupal, “Analysis of Software Defined Network firewall (SDF),†Proc. 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. Wirel. Commun. Signal Process. Networking, WiSPNET 2016, pp. 228–231, 2016.

Z. Wang, D. Tao, and Z. Lin, “Dynamic Virtualization Security Service Construction Strategy for Software Defined Networks,†Proc. - 12th Int. Conf. Mob. Ad-Hoc Sens. Networks, MSN 2016, no. November 2010, pp. 139–144, 2017.

S. R. Afif, P. Sukarno, and M. A. Nugroho, “Analisis Perbandingan Algoritma Naive Bayes dan Decision Tree untuk Deteksi Serangan Denial of Service ( DoS ) pada Arsitektur Software Defined Network ( SDN ) Pendahuluan Studi Terkait,†e-Proceeding Eng., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 7515–7521, 2018.

I. Ummah, “Perancangan Simulasi Jaringan Virtual Berbasis Software-Define Networking,†Indones. J. Comput., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 95–106, 2016.

D. Vicino, C. H. Lung, G. Wainer, and O. Dalle, “Evaluating the impact of Software-Defined Networks’ Reactive Routing on bittorrent performance,†Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 34, pp. 668–673, 2014.

M. H. Hidayat and N. R. Rosyid, “Analisis Kinerja dan Karakteristik Arsitektur Software-Defined Network Berbasis OpenDaylight Controller,†Citee, no. 2085–6350, pp. 194–200, 2017.

R. Afan, A. Virgono, and R. Rumani M., “ANALISIS EFEK PENGGUNAAN KONTROLER RYU DAN POX PADA PERFORMANSI JARINGAN SDN ANALYISIS OF EFFECT OF CONTROLLER RYU AND POX ON SDN NETWORK PERFORMANCE,†vol. 2, no. 14, pp. 68–82, 2018.

D. Kreutz, F. M. V. Ramos, P. E. Verissimo, C. E. Rothenberg, S. Azodolmolky, and S. Uhlig, “Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey,†Proc. IEEE, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 14–76, 2015.

S. N. Hertiana, Hendrawan, and A. Kurniawan, “Performance analysis of flow-based routing in software-defined networking,†Proc. - Asia-Pacific Conf. Commun. APCC 2016, pp. 579–585, 2016.

S. L. Hanifa and R. Kartadie, “UJI PERFORMA KONTROLER SOFTWARE-DEFINE NETWORK FLOODLIGHT vs ONOS,†JIPI (Jurnal Ilm. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 138–144, 2018.

R. Khondoker, A. Zaalouk, R. Marx, and K. Bayarou, “Feature-based comparison and selection of Software Defined Networking (SDN) controllers,†2014 World Congr. Comput. Appl. Inf. Syst. WCCAIS 2014, 2014.

M. Karakus and A. Durresi, “Quality of Service (QoS) in Software Defined Networking (SDN): A survey,†J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 80, pp. 200–218, 2017.

M. Saad Waheed, M. Al Mufarrej, M. Sobhieh, A. Al Barrak, A. Baig, and A. Al Mazyad, “Implementation of virtual firewall function in SDN (software defined networks),†2017 9th IEEE-GCC Conf. Exhib. GCCCE 2017, pp. 1–9, 2018.

S. Y. Wang, “Comparison of SDN OpenFlow network simulator and emulators: EstiNet vs. Mininet,†Proc. - Int. Symp. Comput. Commun., 2014.

S. Reynita Sari, R. Munadi, and D. Dwi Sanjoyo, “ANALISIS PERFORMANSI SEGMENT ROUTING PADA SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORK MENGGUNAKAN KONTROLER ONOS,†vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2–8, 2019.

O. M. Mon and M. T. Mon, “Quality of Service Sensitive Routing for Software Defined Network Using Segment Routing,†Isc. 2018 - 18th Int. Symp. Commun. Inf. Technol., no. Iscit, pp. 255–260, 2018.

C. Liu, A. Raghuramu, C. N. Chuah, and B. Krishnamurthy, “Piggybacking network functions on SDN reactive routing: A feasibility study,†SOSR 2017 - Proc. 2017 Symp. SDN Res., pp. 34–40, 2017.

J. Jiang and G. Han, “Routing Protocols for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles,†IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 58–63, 2018.

G. E. Rizos, D. C. Vasiliadis, and E. Stergioy, “Improving performance on mobile ad hoc networks by using proxy service,†WSEAS Trans. Commun., vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1137–1146, 2008.

R. Wulandari, “ANALISIS QoS (QUALITY OF SERVICE) PADA JARINGAN INTERNET (STUDI KASUS : UPT LOKA UJI TEKNIK PENAMBANGAN JAMPANG KULON – LIPI),†J. Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 162–172, 2016.

ETSI, “Tr 101 329 V2.1.1 (1999-06),†Telecommun. Internet Protoc. Harmon. Over Networks, vol. 1, pp. 1–37, 1999.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/innovatics.v3i2.4354

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.