Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jendela PLS: Jurnal Cendekiawan Ilmiah Pendidikan Luar Sekolah adalah jurnal berkala ilmiah yang diterbitkan dua kali setahun (Juni-Desember) yang mempublikasikan hasil penelitian orisinal tentang keilmuan pendidikan nonformal dan informal. Jurnal ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan konsep, teori, perspektif, paradigma, dan metodologi dalam kajian ilmu Pendidikan nonformal

Ruang lingkup Jurnal Jendela PLS meliputi :

  1. Pengembangan sosial dan pembangunan masyarakat
  2. pendidikan orang dewasa dan andragogi
  3. pendidikan keluarga, gender dan anak usia dini
  4. pendidikan kecakapan hidup
  5. pemberdayaan masyarakat
  6. model, strategi dan metode pelatihan dan kursus
  7. model, strategi dan metode pembelajaran pendidikan nonformal

 

Section Policies

ARTICLE

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

SKRIPSI

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

PROCEEDING

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

SEMINAR

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Review Polic

 

  1. Setiap naskah yang masuk akan dicek menggunakan web cek plagiarisme, grammarly.com
  2. Setiap naskah yang masuk akan melalui proses review.
  3. Proses review menggunakan double blind peer review.
  4. Dalam proses review mitra bebestari memberikanan pertimbangan terkait dengan kebaruan, dampak ilmiah, simpulan dan referensi yang digunakan.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewer Jendela PLS: Jurnal Cendekiawan Ilmiah Pendidikan Luar Sekolah is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society. 

Duties of Publisher

Program Studi Pendidikan Masyarakat FKIP Universitas Siliwangi as the publisher of Jendela PLS: Jurnal Cendekiawan Ilmiah Pendidikan Luar Sekolah takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Program Studi Pendidikan Masyarakat FKIP Universitas Siliwangi and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication Decisions

The editor of the Jendela PLS: Jurnal Cendekiawan Ilmiah Pendidikan Luar Sekolah is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest 

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

 

Tanggungjawab Editor

  1. Editor bertanggungjawab dalam memutuskan artikel yang layak dipublikasikan melalui rapat dewan redaksi. Editor dipandu oleh kebijakan dewan editorial jurnal dan dibatasi oleh persyaratan hukum yang berlaku mengenai pencemaran nama baik, pelanggaran hak cipta dan plagiarisme.
  2. Dalam proses penerimaan artikel, tim editor berasaskan pada asas kesamaan perlakuan.
  3. Dalam proses review jurnal dan pengambilan keputusan publikasi (artikel), tim editor tidak membedakan ras, jenis kelamin, agama, etnis, kewarganegaraan, atau ideologi politik penulis.
  4. Editor dan tim editorial tidak akan mengungkapkan setiap informasi tentang naskah atau artikel yang masuk kecuali atas izin penulisnya.
  5. Naskah (artikel) yang tidak diterbitkan setelah diajukan tidak akan digunakan oleh penelitian editor sendiri dan akan dikembalikan langsung kepada penulisnya.

 

Tanggungjawab Reviewer

Reviewer membantu editor dalam membuat keputusan editorial terhadap naskah/artikel yang masuk

  1. Reviewer bertanggungjawab terhadap rekomendasi arikel yang direview
  2. Review  naskah dilakukan secara obyektif, dan didukung oleh argumentasi yang jelas.
  3. Reviewer bertanggungjawab terhadap kutipan, referensi, dan plagiarisme atas artikel yang direview.
  4. Reviewer menjaga kerahasiaan informasi untuk keuntungan pribadi.

 

Tanggung jawab Penulis

  1. Penulis harus menyajikan artikel hasil pemikiran atau penelitiannya secara jelas, jujur, dan tanpa plagiasi, dan manipulasi data.
  2. Penulis bertanggungjawab atas konfirmasi yang diajukan atas artikel yang telah ditulis.
  3. Penulis harus mematuhi persyaratan publikasi berupa orisinalitas karya, tidak plagiat, dan belum pernah diterbitkan di jurnal atau publikasi lain.
  4. Penulis harus menunjukkan rujukan dari pendapat dan karya orang lain yang dikutip
  5. Penulis harus menulis naskah atau artikel secara etis, jujur dan bertanggung jawab, sesuai dengan peraturan kepenulisan ilmiah yang berlaku.
  6. Penulis dilarang mengirimkan/menerbitkan artikel yang sama ke lebih dari satu jurnal atau publikasi.
  7. Penulis tidak berkeberatan jika naksah mengalami penyuntingan tanpa mengubah subtansi atau ide pokok tulisan.

 

Tanggung jawab Penerbit (Publisher)

  1. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP) dan Ikatan Akademisi Pendidikan Non Formal dan In Formal (IKAPENFI) sebagai penerbit jurnal Jendela PLS
  2. bertanggungjawab menerbitkan artikel yang setelah melalui proses editing, peer review, layout sesuai dengan aturan penerbitan Jurnal Ilmiah.
  3. akultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP) dan Ikatan Akademisi Pendidikan Non Formal dan In Formal (IKAPENFI) bertanggungjawab menjamin kebebasan akademik bagi para editor dan reviewer dalam menjalankan tugasnya maisng-masing.
  4. akultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP) dan Ikatan Akademisi Pendidikan Non Formal dan In Formal (IKAPENFI)bertanggungjawab menjaga privasi dan melindungi kekayaan intelektual dan hak cipta, dan kebebasan editorial.

 

Cek Plagiarisme

Setiap naskah yang masuk ke redaksi Jendela PLS (Jurnal Cendekiawan Ilmiah Pendidikan Luar Sekolah) akan diproses screening plagiarism menggunakan turnitin

 

Manajemen Referensi

Jendela PLS (Jurnal Cendekiawan Ilmiah Pendidikan Luar Sekolah) dalam penulisan sitasi dan Daftar Pustaka menggunakan Software Manajemen Referensi Mendeley.