LEARNING TRAJECTORY PESERTA DIDIK BERDASARKAN ARGUMENTASI MATEMATIS

Naufal Firdaus, Supratman Supratman, Dedi Muhtadi, Nani Ratnaningsih

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis learning trajectory peserta didik berdasarkan argumentasi matematis. Penelitian menggunakan kualitatif-deskriptif dengan pendekatan eksploratif. Subjek penelitian diambil secara purposive sebanyak empat orang peserta didik kelas VIII SMP Islam Terpadu Qoshrul Muhajirin berdasarkan learning trajectory peserta didik dan tipe argumentasi. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan tes argumentasi matematis, tes tipe argumentasi dan wawancara tidak terstruktur. Teknik analisis data meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan: (1) learning trajectory peserta didik pada tipe argumentasi matematis induktif yaitu menyelesaikan permasalahan dengan memanfaatkan gambar pada soal. (2) learning trajectory peserta didik pada tipe argumentasi matematis aljabar menggunakan rumus khusus dalam menyelesaikan masalah. (3) learning trajectory peserta didik pada tipe argumentasi matematis pictorial menggunakan ilustrasi gambar dengan rumus dalam menyelesaikan masalah.  (4) learning trajectory peserta didik pada tipe argumentasi matematis perseptual dengan menggunakan bantuan ilustrasi gambar pada soal serta membuktikannya dengan rumus terstruktur.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adolphus, T. (2011). Problems of Teaching and Learning of Geometry in Secondary Schools in Rivers State , Nigeria. Int. J. Emerg. Sci. IJES, 1(June), 143–152.

Anwar, & Rofiki, I. (2018). Investigating students ’ learning trajectory : a case on triangle. Journal of Physics: Conference Serie, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012021

Begona, C. (2014). Proofs, mathematical practice and argumentation. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-014-9344-0

Bieda, K. N., Ji, X., Drwencke, J., & Picard, A. (2013). Reasoning and proving opportunities in elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.06.005

Blair, J. A. (2005). A Time for Argument Theory Integration. Critical Problems in Argumentation. http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/crrarpubhttp://scholar.uwindsor.ca/crrarpub/12http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/communicationspub

Cardetti, F., & LeMay, S. (2019). Argumentation: Building Students’ Capacity for Reasoning Essential to Learning Mathematics and Sciences. PRIMUS, 29(8), 775–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2018.1482581

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004). Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (1998). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 287–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A

Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. In Sci Ed (Vol. 84).

Fauzi, I., & Arisetyawan, A. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa pada Materi Geometri di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 11(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v11i1.20726

Felton, M., & Gilabert, S. (2009). Deliberation versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom MERCE GARCIA-MILA. In Informal Logic (Vol. 29, Issue 4).

Hatzikiriakou, K., & Metallidou, P. (2009). Teaching deductive reasoning to pre-service teachers: promises and constraints. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 81–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9113-8

Hoyles, C., & Kuchemann, D. (2002). Students’ understandings of logical implication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 193–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023629608614

Indrawatiningsih, N., Purwanto, As’ari, A. R., Sa’dijah, C., & Dwiyana. (2019). Students ’ mathematical argumentation ability in determining arguments or not arguments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012053

Kirkpatrick, J. (2016). The effects of argumentation on student motivation in mathematics. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt

Knudsen, J., Lara-Meloy, T., Stevens, H. S., & Rutstein, D. W. (2014). Advice for Mathematical Argumentation. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19(8), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.19.8.0494

Kuhn, D., & Moore, W. (2015). Argumentation as core curriculum. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.994254

Laamena, C. (2017). Karakteristik warrant dalam argumentasi dan pembuktian matematis. Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian Universitas Kanjuruhan Malang, 3, 296–302.

Lameena, C. M., Nusantara, T., Irawan, E. B., & Muksar, M. (2018). Analysis of the students’ argumentation based on the level of ability : study on the process of mathematical proof. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012156

Liu, Y., Manouchehri, A., Brosnan, P., & Clemens, H. (2013). Aspects of Mathematical Arguments that Influence Eighth Grade Students’ Judgment of.

Liu, Y., Tague, J., & Somayajulu, R. (2016). What do eight grade students look for when determining if a mathematical argument is convincing. IEJME-Mathematics Education, 11.

NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for School Mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Nordin, A. K., & Björklund Boistrup, L. (2018). A framework for identifying mathematical arguments as supported claims created in day-to-day classroom interactions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.06.005

Noto, M. S., Priatna, N., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). Mathematical proof: the learning obstacle of pre-service mathematics teachers on transformation geometry. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5379.117-126

Nurdin. (2011). Trajektori dalam pembelajaran matematika. Edumatica, 01(April), 1–7.

Nussbaum, E. M. (2011a). Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.558816

Nussbaum, E. M. (2011b). Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education. In Educational Psychologist (Vol. 46, Issue 2, pp. 84–106). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.558816

Quintana, R., & Correnti, R. (2019). The right to argue: teaching and assessing everyday argumentation skills. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(8), 1133–1151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1450967

Rohendi, D., Septian, S., & Sutarno, H. (2018). The Use of Geometry Learning Media Based on Augmented Reality for Junior High School Students The Use of Geometry Learning Media Based on Augmented Reality for Junior High School Students. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012029

Rosita, C. D., Kusumah, Y. S., Suryadi, D., & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2019a). Implementation of cooperative integrated reading and composition ( CIRC ) to enhance mathematical argumentation ability of mathematics teacher students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 0–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042002

Rosita, C. D., Kusumah, Y. S., Suryadi, D., & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2019b). Implementation of cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) to enhance mathematical argumentation ability of mathematics teacher students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042002

Rumsey, C., & Langrall, C. W. (2016). Promoting mathematical argumentation. Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(7), 413–419.

Sukirwan. (2016). Argumentasi matematis mahasiswa calon guru pada suatu konjektur matematika. JPPM, 9(1), 93–101.

Surya, A. (2011). Learninng trajectory pada pembelajaran sekolah dasar (SD). Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmiah, 4(2), 22–26.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/jarme.v5i2.5970

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME)
Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana Universitas Siliwangi
Jl. Siliwangi no. 24 Kota Tasikmalaya - 46115
email: jarme@unsil.ac.id
e-ISSN: 2655-7762
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
StatCounter:
WebAnalytics Made Easy - StatCounter
Detail

Indexed by :

Moraref One Search BASE - Bielefeld Academich Search Engine DRJI Indexed Journal