A Comparative Study of Financial Reporting: Assessing Performance and Compliance in Conventional and Islamic Entities

Nurul Asmi Pratiwi

Abstract


Introduction to The Problem: In an era where financial systems are not only judged by their numbers but also by their values, financial reporting remains fragmented—technically robust yet ethically hollow. Conventional financial statements emphasize profitability and efficiency, while Islamic financial reports aim to integrate moral accountability. However, the absence of a unified evaluative model that embraces both operational soundness and ethical compliance leaves stakeholders with an incomplete picture.

Purpose/Objective Study: This study seeks to bridge that gap by presenting a comparative analysis of financial reporting practices in conventional and Islamic entities, focusing on how performance and compliance are reflected, interpreted, and disclosed within each system.

Design/Methodology/Approach: Employing a qualitative-descriptive approach, the study analyzes financial reports of representative Indonesian banks—one conventional and one Sharia-compliant. A three-phase methodology is applied: document analysis, comparative matrix construction, and interpretive synthesis. The study benchmarks both performance metrics (liquidity, solvency, profitability) and compliance elements (ethical disclosure, Sharia conformity) using global and Islamic accounting standards.

Findings: Findings reveal fundamental philosophical divergences. Conventional reports center on shareholder value, while Islamic reports embody dual accountability—both financial and spiritual. Key distinctions include additional disclosures such as zakat and qardhul hasan, the use of Unrestricted Investment Accounts (URIA), and oversight by Sharia Supervisory Boards. Although conventional banks exhibit stronger profitability, Islamic banks demonstrate higher ethical transparency and resilience. The study proposes an integrative evaluative framework, enabling stakeholders to assess financial health alongside social and spiritual integrity.

Paper Type: Research Article


Keywords


financial reporting; Islamic finance; performance analysis; Sharia compliance; ethical accountability

References


Abdul Rahman, A, M. H Yahya, and M. H. M Nasir. 2022. “Financial Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks: Evidence during Global Crises.” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 71.

Alnasser, S. A. S, and J Muhammed. 2012. “Introduction to Corporate Governance from Islamic Perspective.” Humanomics 28(3):220–231.

Alqahtani, F, and D. G Mayes. 2018. “Financial Stability of Islamic Banking and the Global Financial Crisis: Evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council.” Economic Systems 42(2):346–360.

Beck, Thorsten, Asli Demirgüç-Kunt, and Ouarda Merrouche. 2013. “Islamic vs. Conventional Banking: Business Model, Efficiency and Stability.” Journal of Banking & Finance 37(2):433–447.

Dusuki, A. W, and N. I Abdullah. 2007. “Maqasid Al-Shariah, Maslahah, and Corporate Social Responsibility.” The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 24(1):25–45.

F., Eugene, Brigham, and Joel F. Houston. 2001. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi Kede. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Farook, S, M. K Hassan, and R Lanis. 2011. “Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Case of Islamic Banks.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 2(2):114–141.

Grassa, R. 2013. “Shariah Governance System in Islamic Financial Institutions: New Issues and Challenges.” Arab Law Quarterly 27(2):171–187.

Harahap, Sofyan Syafri. 2021. Analisis Kritis Atas Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Hasan, M, and J Dridi. 2010. “The Effects of the Global Crisis on Islamic and Conventional Banks: A Comparative Study.” IMF Working Papers 10(201):1–46.

Kamaruddin, M. I. H., M. M. Hanefah, and Z. Shafii. 2021. “Shariah Governance Practices and Audit Quality in Islamic Banks: A Multi-Jurisdictional Perspective.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 12(1):104–123.

Mohammed, M. O. 2007. “The Objectives of Islamic Economic and Finance: A Maqasid Approach.” IIUM Journal of Economics and Management 15(2):117–139.

Muhammad. 2014. MANAJEMEN KEUANGAN SYARI’AH ANALISIS FIQH & KEUANGAN. Edisi Pert. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Sarea, A, and M. M Hanefah. 2013. “The Need of Accounting Standards for Islamic Financial Institutions: Evidence from AAOIFI.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 4(1):64–76.

Wahyuningtyas, Endah Tri, Niken Savitri Primasari, Zujajatul ’Ilmi, Lalu Muhammad Syahril Majidi, Dina Anggraeni Suseti, Hidayatul Khusnah, Mohammad Ghofirin, and Riyan Sisiawan Putra. 2021. Analisis Laporan Keuangan Syariah. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi. Vol. 2. Surabaya: Kantor Perwakilan Bank Indonesia Provinsi Jawa Timur. https://doi.org/10.54066/jura-itb.v2i2.1805.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/jes.v10i2.15626

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal index by:

   

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Â