Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Microteaching pada Era New Normal Berdasarkan Model Countenance Stake

Kistantia Elok Mumpuni, Slamet Santosa, Dwi Oetomo, Suranto Aw

Abstract


Pandemi Covid-19 telah mempengaruhi domain pendidikan dalam skala global. Tantangannya adalah bagaimana menyesuaikan pelaksanaan microteaching agar dapat dilaksanakan secara daring dan luring terbatas pada Era New Normal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kesesuaian perencanaan, proses pembelajaran dan penilaiannya, serta hasil belajar mahasiswa pada pembelajaran microteaching. Evaluasi dilaksanakan dengan Model Countenance Stake. Pembelajaran microteaching berhasil dilaksanakan dengan baik di era new normal. pada tahap anteseden (perencanaan pembelajaran dan fasilitas) diperoleh persentase sebesar 91,3%, tahap transaksi (pelaksanaan pembelajaran) diperoleh persentase 86,2%, dan pada outcome (penilaian hasil belajar) diperoleh persentase 100% lulus. Penggunaan tiga metode yaitu daring, luring dan asinkronus mendapatkan respon positif dari mahasiswa. Yang menarik, sesi microteaching yang paling dipilih mahasiswa adalah daring, sedangkan secara luring menempati urutan kedua. Pada pembelajaran microteaching selanjutnya, pasca pandemi pembelajaran luring, disarankan menggunakan dua metode yaitu luring dan daring. Mahasiswa perlu disiapkan untuk transformasi preferensi pembelajaran daring di masa depan dengan teknologi yang lebih maju. Walaupun praktik luring akan tetap memegang porsi yang lebih besar.

Keywords


Evaluation; Microteaching; biology; Era New Normal; Model Countenance Stake

References


Apriana, E. (2015). Penggunaan Berbagai Media Pembelajaran Biologi pada Mata Kuliah Pembelajaran Mikro (Microteaching). Jurnal Biology Education, 4(1). https://ojs.serambimekkah.ac.id/jurnal-biologi/article/view/143/137

Aprilia, N. (2018). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Pengajaran Mikro di Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta. Seminar Nasional Kedua Pendidikan Berkemajuan Dan Menggembirakan (The Second Progressive and Fun Education Seminar), 265–271. http://hdl.handle.net/11617/9610

Aswari, G. Y. (2022). Students’ Opinion on Online Microteaching Class Carried Out During Pandemic Covid 19 [Thesis]. IAIN Batusangkar.

Bachtiar, R. W. (2015). Model Evaluasi Countenance Stake Menggunakan Pendekatan Analisis Rasch terhadap Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Kolaboratif. Saintifika, 19(2). http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/STF

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation : alternative approaches and practical guidelines (J. W. Johnston, Ed.; 4 ed.). Pearson Education.

Karakaş, A., Yesilyurt, Y. E., & Candan, E. (2022). Pre-service English teachers’ emergency remote microteaching experiences and adjustments: Growing gains and lessening pains. Dalam A. Onal & K. Buyukkarci (Ed.), Essentials of Foreign Language Teacher Education (hlm. 135–172). ISRES Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365620020

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. M. (2013). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework for Teachers and Teacher Educators. Dalam ICT Integrated Teacher Education. Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia. http://www.matt-koehler.com/publications/Koehler_et_al_2013.pdf

Kokkinos, T. (2022). Student Teachers and Online Microteaching: Overcoming Challenges in the Age of the Pandemic. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1897–1909. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1897

Kumalasari, D., Purwantara, S., Aw, S., Supardi, S., & Hendrastomo, G. (2022). Online learning implementation in the faculty of social sciences during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Social Studies (JSS), 18(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/jss.v18i2.46870.159-172

Mahmud, Y. S. (2021). Online Teaching and Learning Online Microteaching: A Transformation of Teaching Practices in Teacher Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Dalam Best practices and research in ELT classrooms. Pustaka Ilmu. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354390340

Mergler, A. G., & Tangen, D. (2010). Using microteaching to enhance teacher efficacy in preâ€service teachers. Teaching Education, 21(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210902998466

Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2017). Effects of Teacher Preparation Courses: Do Graduates Use What They Learned to Plan Mathematics Lessons? American Educational Research Journal, 54(3), 524–567. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217695217

Nyoman Tika, I., & Maryam, S. (2021). PEMBELAJARAN MICROTEACHING SELAMA MASSA COVID-19 BERBASISKANTUGAS PROYEKBAGI MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN KIMIA A R T I C L E I N F O. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 5(2), 85–93. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPK/index

PLP FKIP UNS. (2021). Panduan PLP. FKIP UNS.

Prabowo, C. A., Dwiastuti, S., & Triyanto, S. A. (2021). Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Berbasis Proyek pada Mata Kuliah Game Learning. Bioedusiana: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 6(2), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.37058/bioed.v6i2.3948

Popat, Y. (2020). MICROTEACHING: AN EFFECTIVE TOOL TO ENHANCE THE TEACHING SKILLS. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 5(8), 198–206. http://www.ijeast.com

Purwadi, D. A., & Erdilanita, U. (2022). Efektivitas Evaluasi Model Countenance dalam Proses Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani. Jurnal Kejaora (Kesehatan Jasmani Dan Olah Raga), 7(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.36526/kejaora.v7i2.2068

Sihotang, H. (2021). Microteaching Management During The Covid-19 Pandemic in Mathematics Education. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 58(2), 10945. www.psychologyandeducation.net

Stake, R. E. (1967). The Countenance of Educational Evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146816706800707

Suyanto, S., & Wibowo, Y. (2018). Curriculum Review of Teacher Professional Development Program Based on Biology Teacher Profile in Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012042

Tompong, B. N. K. J., & Jailani, J. (2019). An evaluation of mathematics learning program at primary education using Countenance Stake Evaluation model. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.16473

Wibowo, Y., Kurniawati, A., & Handziko, R. C. (2019). Competency of pre-service biology teachers on the academic and pedagogical aspects. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012059

Wood, B. B. (2001). Stake’s Countenance Model: Evaluating an Environmental Education Professional Development Course. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(2), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960109599134




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/bioed.v8i2.10095

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bioedusiana is Indexed by

Indeks Dimensions Indeks Copernicus Indeks Google Scholar Sinta Crossref Garuda  WorldCat BASE Indonesia OneSearch PKP INDEXING