Eksplorasi Kemampuan Proses Inkuiri Mahasiswa Calon Guru IPA: Perspektif dari Gender dan Lama Studi
Abstract
Dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, pengembangan profesionalitas guru IPA mendapat perhatian yang besar, tetapi pengembangan profesionalitas mahasiswa calon guru IPA ditinjau dari kemampuan proses inkuirinya masih belum banyak yang menelitinya. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengeksplorasi kemampuan proses inkuri mahasiswa calon guru IPA berdasarkan gender dan lama studi mahasiswa. Sebanyak 302 mahasiswa calon guru IPA turut berpartisipasi dalam riset ini. Mahasiswa tersebut mulai dari angkatan tahun I hingga tahun IV di salah satu Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan (LPTK) di Jawa Timur. Data yang dikumpulkan dalam riset ini bersumber dari hasil tes kemampuan proses inkuiri yang sebelumnya telah disusun dan ditelaah oleh para ahli dengan metode screening. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kencenderungan mahasiswa calon guru IPA laki-laki cenderung lebih unggul dalam membuat prediksi, penerapan metode statistik, dan membuat kesimpulan, sedangkan mahasiswa calon guru IPA perempuan cenderung unggul dalam identifikasi/merumuskan masalah dan mendesain eksperimen. Selain itu, hanya indikator kemampuan menerapkan metode statistik yang menunjukkan pola linier dengan lama masa studi mahasiswa calon guru IPA.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. J. (2015). The assessment of practical skills. School Science Review, 96(357), 40–44.
Adi Badiozaman, I. F. binti, Leong, H., & Jikus, O. (2019). Investigating student engagement in Malaysian higher education: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1688266
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Bancroft, S. F., & Nyirenda, E. M. (2020). Equity-focused K-12 science teacher professional development: A review of the literature 2001–2017. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(2), 151–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1685629
Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2016). Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1124300
Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., & Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937–1959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.886347
Chang, Y., Li, B.-D., Chen, H.-C., & Chiu, F.-C. (2015). Investigating the synergy of critical thinking and creative thinking in the course of integrated activity in Taiwan. Educational Psychology, 35(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.920079
Fadzil, H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2014). Exploring the influencing factors in students’ acquisition of manipulative skills during transition from primary to secondary school. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 15(2), Article 3, 1-18.
Forbes, C. T., Neumann, K., & Schiepe-Tiska, A. (2020). Patterns of inquiry-based science instruction and student science achievement in PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1730017
Gilbert, J. (2016). Transforming science education for the anthropocene—is it possible? Research in Science Education, 46(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9498-2
Kowalski, S. M., Taylor, J. A., Askinas, K. M., Wang, Q., Zhang, Q., Maddix, W. P., & Tipton, E. (2020). Examining factors contributing to variation in effect size estimates of teacher outcomes from studies of science teacher professional development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1726538
Marco-Bujosa, L. M., McNeill, K. L., & Friedman, A. A. (2019). Becoming an urban science teacher: How beginning teachers negotiate contradictory school contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21583
Molefe, L., & Stears, M. (2014). Rhetoric and reality: Science teacher educators’ views and practice regarding science process skills. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.942961
Nichol, C., Chow, A., & Furtwengler, S. (2018). Year-long teacher professional development on fifth grade student science outcomes. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2099–2117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1521027
Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research – Part A: An Introduction (pp. 152–169). Enschede: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
Rodriguez, A. J. (2015). Managing institutional and sociocultural challenges through sociotransformative constructivism: A longitudinal case study of a high school science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21207
Wright, K. B. (2019). Improvement science as a promising alternative to barriers in improving STEM teacher quality through professional development. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 92(1–2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2018.1532953
Zeyer, A. (2018). Gender, complexity, and science for all: Systemizing and its impact on motivation to learn science for different science subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21413
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34289/bioed.v5i1.1636
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Bioedusiana is Indexed by