ENHANCING STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING IN MATHEMATICS THROUGH COMIC-BASED LEARNING: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
Abstract
Conceptual understanding lies at the heart of meaningful mathematics learning, yet instructional practices in many contexts remain procedural and memorization-based, limiting students’ ability to connect symbolic, verbal, and visual representations. Addressing this gap, this study investigates the effectiveness and cognitive–affective mechanisms of comic-based learning in improving students’ conceptual understanding of mathematics and develops a new theoretical model, the Visual–Narrative Learning Framework (VNLF). Employing a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, the research involved 60 eighth-grade students divided into an experimental group (comic-based instruction) and a control group (conventional teaching). Data were collected through conceptual understanding tests, motivation questionnaires, interviews, and classroom observations. Quantitative data were analyzed using t-tests, gain scores, and effect size, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis. Findings revealed that the experimental group achieved significantly higher conceptual understanding (M = 93.6 vs. 81.4; t(58) = 7.25, p < .001; d = 1.56, large effect; g = 0.72, high category). Comics facilitated the transformation of symbolic ideas into visual–narrative representations, increasing emotional engagement and intrinsic motivation. The integrated results produced the VNLF, which explains conceptual learning as the simultaneous interaction of visualization, narration, and teacher mediation. Theoretically, this study extends the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning by incorporating affective and social dimensions into visual–narrative mathematics instruction. Practically, it positions comic-based learning as an integrative pedagogical strategy that enhances students’ numeracy, visual literacy, and engagement, supporting the goals of the Merdeka Curriculum and advancing digital transformation in mathematics education.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aghaei, D., Hamidi, F., & Nasr, A. (2023). Effects of multimedia-integrated instruction in STEM: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 206, 104903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104903
Ainsworth, S. (2022). How multiple representations can support learning across domains. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2036431
Ainsworth, S., & Rapp, D. N. (2023). Learning from multiple representations: Cognitive and affective integration. Educational Research Review, 39, 100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100568
Akkaya, R., & Karaca, E. (2022). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10089-2
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Kinshuk. (2022). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of 10 years of research. Computers & Education, 182, 104449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104449
Bandura, A. (2021). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010820-110944 Berkowitz, J., & Packer, J. (2018). Comics as literacy scaffolds: Narrative visuals for learning. Journal of Visual Literacy, 37(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2018.1434814
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
British Educational Research Association (BERA). (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). London: BERA. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14205.54242
Chen, C., Zhao, Y., & Xu, B. (2024). Emotional engagement and conceptual learning in multimedia environments: A meta-analytic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107217
Chen, J., Li, Q., & Ni, Y. (2025). Narrative visualization and affective engagement in mathematics learning. Educational Research Review, 40, 100579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100579
Chen, X., & Chan, C. K. (2023). Teacher mediation and student meaning-making in multimodal digital environments. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 37, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100682
Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2023). Replication and generalizability in educational research: Lessons from meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 38, 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100565
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (2023). Dual coding theory revisited: Cognitive and neural evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 1279–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09705-2
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119836485
D’Mello, S. K., & Graesser, A. C. (2023). Emotions as regulators of learning in intelligent systems. Learning and Instruction, 86, 101746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101746
Damsa, C., Nerland, M., & Andree, M. (2022). Situated learning in multimodal environments: Emotional engagement and conceptual development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 34, 100649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100649
Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 103-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134-2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Theoretical foundations and applications. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 930–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000700
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 930–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000700
Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2024). The effects of AR-based learning environments on conceptual understanding: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 223, 105001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105001
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371-404). Information Age Publishing.
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., & Bialik, M. (2022). AI in education: Challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100084
Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2023). Augmented reality and immersive learning: Implications for pedagogy and engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(2), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13324
Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2022). Teachers’ professional digital competence: Dimensions and development in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 119, 103882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103882
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
Kulik, J. A. (2022). Research design considerations for technology-based learning interventions. Computers & Education, 185, 104492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104492
Kurniawan, R., & Widodo, A. (2023). Digital comic-based learning to enhance students’ critical thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00478-5
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lee, J., Kim, S., & Park, Y. (2023). Longitudinal effects of multimodal learning on retention and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 85, 101735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101735
Li, Q., & Ni, Y. (2021). Comic-based problem contexts in mathematics: Effects on students’ conceptual understanding. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(7), 1685–1698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01285-1
Lin, H.-C., & Chen, P.-Y. (2022). Contextual comics for improving mathematical literacy. Computers & Education, 182, 104455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104455
Loderer, K., Pekrun, R., & Brünken, R. (2023). Longitudinal dynamics of emotion and learning performance in multimedia environments. Educational Psychologist, 58(4), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2248725
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859019
Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2023). Multimedia learning and generative activity: From theory to design principles. Educational Psychologist, 58(3), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2200467
Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Rasheed, A. R. (2024). A cognitive–affective–social framework for learning with digital media. Computers & Education, 220, 104965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104965
McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. HarperCollins.
Mekonnen, D., & Teferra, G. (2024). Story-based learning and metacognitive awareness in mathematics classrooms. Educational Research Review, 38, 100567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100567
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher integration in modern education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10062-8
Moreno, R. (2023). Cognitive–affective theory of learning with media revisited. Educational Psychologist, 58(2), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2194573
Mousavinasab, E., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. Y. (2023). Emotion-driven learning design in STEM: A systematic review and future research agenda. Computers & Education, 205, 104889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104889
Nordin, N., & Zakaria, E. (2021). Cognitive-affective mechanisms in conceptual mathematics learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(4), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10093-4
OECD. (2023). AI and the Future of Skills: Education 2030 Report. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ai-future-skills-2023-en
Özdemir, E. (2017). Humor in learning: Comic-based materials for mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(8), 489-500. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3200
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.001.0001
Park, Y., Kim, H., & Lee, J. (2023). Teachers’ technology acceptance and pedagogical transformation in digital learning environments. Computers & Education, 197, 104709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104709
Pekrun, R., Loderer, K., & Muis, K. R. (2023). The control–value theory of achievement emotions: Recent advances and future directions. Educational Psychologist, 58(4), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2248720
Pettersson, F., & Molstad, C. E. (2023). Pedagogical digital competence: Teachers’ adaptation and transformation in post-pandemic classrooms. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11211–11228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11878-5
Plass, J. L., & Kaplan, U. (2024). Emotion in learning with media: Integrative perspectives. Learning and Instruction, 87, 101760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101760
Rapp, D. N., & Ainsworth, S. (2022). Multimodal learning and cognitive integration: Advances and directions. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2098321
Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., & Tondeur, J. (2023). Teacher technology acceptance revisited: A meta-analysis of factors influencing digital integration in classrooms. Computers & Education, 214, 104926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104926
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making. Journal of Education, 196(2), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2020). Foundations of mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., & Malik, A. S. (2022). The neuroscience of emotion in learning: Neural mechanisms and educational implications. Neuroeducation, 10(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroed.2022.02.005
Wang, Y., & Holmlund, T. D. (2022). An integrated engagement framework for learning and teaching in the digital age. Computers & Education, 187, 104545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104545
Zhang, T., & Zhou, Y. (2022). Narrative-based and visual learning strategies in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 36, 100457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100457
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/jarme.v8i1.15538
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Penelitian Otentik Pendidikan Matematika (JARME)
Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Siliwangi
Jl. Siliwangi no. 24 Kota Tasikmalaya - 46115
email: jarme@unsil.ac.id
e-ISSN: 2655-7762
Dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
StatCounter: Detail
Diindeks oleh :

.jpg)



