LITERAT MELALUI PRESENTASI

Iis Lisnawati, Yuni Ertinawati

Abstract


The literacy ability of the Indonesian nation is still not in line with expectations. One solution to the problem is to integrate literacy in learning, especially presentation learning. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to describe the integration of literacy in the presentation of learning to students in universities. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative method. The form of integrating literacy in presentation learning is by using an eclectic type of literacy (early literacy, basic literacy, library literacy, media literacy, technology literacy, or visual literacy) according to the needs at each stage of speaking, either at (1) pre-speaking stage, (2) speaking stage, and (3) post-speaking stage. Implementation of learning is done cooperatively student and stdent, collaboratively between student, lecturer, and instructor and interaction between student, lecturer, instructor, and learning materials. Thus, this strategy is expected to build a multiliterat and multicompetence students.

Keywords


Information literacy; Literacy; Presentation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdelrahman, M.B.; Jwaifell, M. dan El-Subhieen, E. (2014). Information Literacy: Study of Incoming First-YearUndergraduates Students Who Major in English Language at Al- Hussein Bin ]. Talal University. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol.5, No.18, 2014. [Online]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301205128_

Abidin, Y. (2015). Pembelajaran Multiliterasi. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Alwasilah, A. Ch. (2012). Pokoknya Rekayasa Literasi. Bandung: PT Kiblat Utama.

Bundy, A. 2004. Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, Standards and Practice. Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy (ANZIIL) and Council of Australian University Librarians (CAUL). [Online]. Tersedia: http://archive.caul.edu.au/info-literacy/InfoLiteracyFramework.pdf.

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitatice and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson.

Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2016). Desain Induk Gerakan Literasi Sekolah. Jakrta: Dirjen Dikdasmen.

Fanta-Vagenshtein, Y. (2011). Literacy and second language intervention for adult HebrewSecond Language (HSL) Learners. Journal of Language and Literacy Education 7 (1),79-94. [Online].Tersedia: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1097242.pdf.

Ferguson, B. (2013). Information Literacy. [Online]. Tersedia; http://www.bibliotech.us/ pdfs/InfoLit.pdf

Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lisnawati, I. (2016). Pembelajaran Berbicara Berbasis Kearifan Lokal dan Berorientasi Literasi Budaya sebagai Alternatif Strategi Pembangun Karakter Bangsa. Prosiding Konferensi Internasional VI, Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Daerah Indonesia. Ikatan Dosen Budaya Daerah Indonesia. Lampung 2016.

Lisnawati, I. Yuniawati, Y. & Kusmini, T. (2017). Student Presentations Upgrades Through Use of Language Learning Strategies. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning Volume 2 No 2 September 2017. Page Number 238-243. [Online]. Tersedia: http://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JETL/article/view/293.

Lloyd, A. (2010). Information Literacy LandscapesInformation Literacy in Education, Workplace And Everyday Contexts. New Delhi: Chandos Publishing.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Peringkat dan Capaian PISA Indonesia Mengalami Peningkatan 06 Desember 2016[Online]. Tersedia: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2016/12/peringkat-dan-capaian-pisa-indonesia-mengalami-peningkatan.

Mulyati, Y. (2012). Belajar Aktif Vs Aktif Belajar Menggagas Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Penguatan Kearifan Lokal dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2004).Literacy for Learning: The Report of the Expert Panel on Literacy in Grades 4 to 6 in Ontario.

Sang, Y. (2017). Expanded Territories of Literacy: New Literacies and Multiliteracies. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol.8, No.8, 2017. P 16-19. [Online]. Tersedia: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1139059.pdf.

Setiadi, R. (2010), Self Efficacy in Indoensian Literacy Teaching Context: Atheortical and Empirical Perspective. Bandung: Rizki Press.

Suryaman, M. (2015). Peran Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dalam Mempersiapkan Anak Bangsa Menuju Masyarakat Asean. Makalah dalam Seminar Nasional Peran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA), STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 25 November 2015.

Suwandi, S. (2015). Peran Bahasa Indonesia dalam Pengembangan Budaya Literasi untuk Mewujudkan Bangsa yang Unggul dalam Konteks Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean. Makalah dalam Seminar Nasional Peran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA), STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 25 November 2015.

Wang, Y. dan Gao, X. (2016). Exploring the Expectation Differences of Teachers’ Roles In English Class Presentation, Teacher Development. An International Journal of Teachers' Professional Development 92-105.

Wells, G. (1987). Apprenticeship in Literacy. Interchange. Vol. 18. Nos.1/2 (Spring/Summer). [Online]. Tersedia: https://link.springer.com/article/10.10072FBF01807064




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/metaedukasi.v1i1.976

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Metaedukasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan 
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Siliwangi
Jl. Siliwangi No. 24 Kota Tasikmalaya - 46115
email: jurnalmetaedukasi@unsil.ac.id
e-ISSN: 2714-7851

Creative Commons License
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
StatCounter:

View Metaedukasi Stats

Indexing by: