Collaborative Innovations in Feedback Provision and Their Effectiveness with ChatGPT-based Approaches for Academic Writing

Zahra Ardeassyifa Fauziah, Evi Karlina Ambarwati

Abstract


In this evolving generation, examining the educational sector, feedback has been a critical element of the educational process, helping the drill and students' performance. With the discovery of Artificial Intelligence innovations, thrilling possibilities were offered for the feedback process enhancement. This study explores the perceptions of both students and educators on the role of collaborative innovations in feedback provision when integrated with ChatGPT-based approaches in academic writing. Additionally, it examines how the incorporation of ChatGPT in collaborative feedback settings influences student engagement and writing development, considering perspectives from both groups. This study utilizes a narrative review approach of 44 studies, 39 of which are highly relevant, to examine ChatGPT's role in feedback mechanisms. It highlights strengths in personalized feedback and limitations in complex interactions. as the primary source of data collection. The literature review reveals that incorporating ChatGPT into feedback processes, as viewed by both students and educators, provides significant benefits such as enhanced accessibility, improved efficiency, and personalized technical assistance, while also highlighting limitations in handling complex or nuanced interactions. However, it also presents challenges, such as the risk of students becoming overly dependent on AI and the tool's limitations in addressing conceptual aspects of writing. Therefore, ChatGPT and feedback mechanisms are likely to remain integrated into academic writing processes for the time ahead.

 

Keywords: Academic Writing, AI, ChatGPT, Collaborative Innovations, Feedback


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, M. A., Khan, A. A., Mahmood, S., Rafi, S., & Demi, S. (2024). Trustworthy artificial intelligence: A decision-making taxonomy of potential challenges. Software - Practice and Experience, 54(9), 1621–1650. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3216

Ali, J. K. M., Shamsan, M. A. A., Hezam, T. A., & Mohammed, A. A. Q. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51

Ali, O. B. , & Mtalsi, D. (2024). Insights from educators: Exploring the role of Artificial Intelligence in academic writing. Ikhtilaf Journal of Critical Humanities and Social Studies, 2(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4582

Artiana, N., & Fakhrurriana, R. (2024). EFL undergraduate students’ perspective on using AI-based ChatGPT in academic writing. Language and Education Journal, 9 (1), https://doi.org/10.52237/lej.v9i1.468

Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0

Bibi, Z., & Atta, A. (2024). The Role of ChatGPT as AI English writing assistant: A study of student’s perceptions, experiences, and satisfaction. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(I). https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-i)39

Bui, L., & Deakin, J. (2021). What we talk about when we talk about vulnerability and youth crime: A narrative review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101605

Bulut, O., & Wongvorachan, T. (2022). Feedback Generation through Artificial Intelligence. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Conference, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18357/otessac.2022.2.1.125

Cao, S., & Zhong, L. (2023). Exploring the effectiveness of ChatGPT-based feedback compared with teacher feedback and self-feedback: Evidence from Chinese to English translation. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.01645

Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2023). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510

Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4

Faulconer, E., Griffith, J., & Gruss, A. (2022). The impact of positive feedback on student outcomes and perceptions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1910140

Gasaymeh, A. M. M., Beirat, M. A., & Abu Qbeita, A. A. (2024). University Students’ Insights of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools. Education Sciences, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062

Ginting, P., Batubara, H. M., & Hasnah, Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence powered writing tools as adaptable aids for academic writing: Insight from EFL college learners in writing final project. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 6(10), 4640-4650.

Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?. European journal of clinical investigation, 48(6), e12931. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931

Harunasari, S. Y. (2023). Examining the Effectiveness of AI-integrated Approach in EFL Writing: A Case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 39(2), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v39.2.5516

Hassani, H., Silva, E. S., Unger, S., TajMazinani, M., & Mac Feely, S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Intelligence Augmentation (IA): What Is the Future? AI, 1(2), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai1020008

Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R. et al. Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technology, 30, 1265–1300 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7

Knight, S., Shibani, A., Abel, S., Gibson, A., Ryan, P., Sutton, N., Wight, R., Lucas, C., Sándor, Á., Kitto, K., Liu, M., Mogarkar, R. V., & Shum, S. B. (2020). AcaWriter A learning analytics tool for formative feedback on academic writing. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 141–186. https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2020.12.01.06

Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13 (4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in academic essay: Higher education student’s perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296

Meyer, J. G., Urbanowicz, R. J., Martin, P. C., O’Connor, K., Li, R., Peng, P. C., ... & Moore, J. H. (2023). ChatGPT and large language models in academia: opportunities and challenges. BioData mining, 16(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00339-9

Mizumoto, A., Shintani, N., Sasaki, M., & Teng, M. F. (2024). Testing the viability of ChatGPT as a companion in L2 writing accuracy assessment. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100116

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153

Mun, C. (2024). EFL learners’ English writing feedback and their perception of using ChatGPT. STEM Journal, 25(2), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2024.25.2.26

Oktarin, I. B., Saputri, M. E. E., Magdalena, B., Hastomo, T., & Maximilian, A. (2024). Leveraging ChatGPT to enhance students’ writing skills, engagement, and feedback literacy. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(4), 2306–2319. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1600

Olsen, T., & Hunnes, J. (2024). Improving students’ learning—the role of formative feedback: experiences from a crash course for business students in academic writing. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2187744

Perdana, I., Manullang, S. O., & Masri, F. A. (2021). Effectiveness of online Grammarly application in improving academic writing: review of experts experience. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n1.1444

Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101

Polakova, P., & Klimova, B. (2023). Using DeepL translator in learning English as an applied foreign language – An empirical pilot study. Heliyon, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18595

Rahma, A., & Fithriani, R. (2024). The potential impact of using Chat GPTon EFLl students’ writing: Teachers’ perspective. Indonesian EFL Journal, 10(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v10i1.9222

Razack, H. I. A., Mathew, S. T., Saad, F. F. A., & Alqahtani, S. A. (2021). Artificial intelligence-assisted tools for redefining the communication landscape of the scholarly world. Science Editing, 8(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.244

Ryan, M. (2020). In AI we trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and reliability. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(5), 2749–2767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00228-y

Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843

Spirgi, L., Seufert, S., Delcker, J., & Heil, J. (2024). Student Perspectives on Ethical Academic Writing with ChatGPT: An Empirical Study in Higher Education. International Conference on Computer Supported Education ,2, 179–186. https://doi.org/10.5220/0012555700003693

Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., Moon, Y., Tseng, W., Warschauer, M., & Olson, C. B. (2024). Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing. Learning and Instruction, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894

Telaumbanua, Y. A., Marpaung, A., Gulo, C. P. D., Waruwu, D. K. W., Zalukhu, E., & Zai, N. P. (2024). Analysis of two translation applications: Why is DeepL Translate more accurate than Google Translate?. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA), 4(1), 82-86. https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v4i1.560

Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270

Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., & Sumarwati. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive? Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419

Wahyuningsih, S. (2020). The role of corrective feedback on academic writing performance: EFL students’ perceptions. Edulingua: Jurnal Linguistiks Terapan dan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.34001/edulingua.v7i1.1167

Wale, B. D., & Kassahun, Y. F. (2024). The transformative power of AI writing technologies: enhancing EFL writing instruction through the integrative use of writerly and Google Docs. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9221377

Wambsganss, T., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2022). Enhancing argumentative writing with automated feedback and social comparison nudging. Computers and Education, 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104644

Zeevy-Solovey, O. (2024). Comparing peer, ChatGPT, and teacher corrective feedback in EFL writing: Students’ perceptions and preferences. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n3.1482




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/tlemc.v9i1.14079

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


INDEXED BY:

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statcounter Global Stats - Browser, OS, Search Engine including Mobile Usage Share

WebAnalytics Made Easy - StatCounter

TLEMC (Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts)
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Siliwangi
Jl. Siliwangi No. 24 Kota Tasikmalaya - 46115
email: tlemc@unsil.ac.id