Writing “Jantur”: Art-based playwriting from Dadaha folklore using Greimas’s actantial model

Budi Riswandi, Sumiyadi Sumiyadi, Dadang Sunendar

Abstract


This study develops an operational playwriting framework by integrating Greimas’s actantial model into an Art-Based Research (ABR) process to transform the Dadaha folklore into a contemporary drama script, “Jantur.” Data were drawn from five oral informants, local archival sources, contextual socio-ecological materials, and an auditable trail of iterative script drafts. The ABR process was organized into a cyclical workflow comprising (1) narrative segmentation and motif indexing, (2) actantial mapping of functional relations and value oppositions, (3) canonical narrative schema alignment (manipulation–competence–performance–sanction), (4) semiotic – to - dramaturgical translation into scene objectives, obstacle systems, and escalation patterns, and (5) reflective revision supported by documented decision logs and expert feedback. Rather than treating narrative semiotics as post hoc interpretation, actantial mapping is positioned as a generative compositional logic that regulates character functions, conflict configuration, and ethical causality during drafting. The resulting script demonstrates how creative writing can operate as analytical inquiry, preserving the folklore’s ecological and ethical meanings while recontextualizing them for contemporary performance and learning contexts. Methodologically, the study contributes a replicable semiotic-to-dramaturgical workflow that makes the analysis-to-composition pathway transparent and reusable for folklore-to-drama adaptation and scriptwriting pedagogy.

 

Keywords: Actantial mapping; Art-Based Research; Folklore-to-drama adaptation; Greimas’s actantial model; Playwriting


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ab Jabar, N., Sukri, S., Daeng Jamal, D. H., Kiffli, S., & Suliman, M. S. (2024). Literature and cultural ecology: The relationship between folklore and environmental sustainability. BIO Web of Conferences, 131, 03007. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202413103007

Abdullaev, U. (2024).Literary works as the most important and well-acclaimed components of the cultural heritage of the nation. Ижтимоий-Гуманитар Фанларнинг Долзарб Муаммолари / Актуальные Проблемы Социально-Гуманитарных Наук / Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 4(3). https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V4I3Y2024N50

Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996306

Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts Based Research. In Arts Based Research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230627

Bastet, T., & Houlbrook, C. (2023). Folklore: Cultural roadmaps to creating, perpetuating, resolving and evolving peace and conflict. Peace Review, 35(2), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2023.2222667

Hunter, L., B. (2014). Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances by Robin Nelson. Contemporary Theatre Review, 24(3), 407–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10486801.2014.921027

Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-Based Research in the creative arts: Foundations and futures from the front line. Leonardo, 51(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01471

Escobar Varela, M. (2019). The dramaturgy of theatre fieldtrips: studying cultural relativism in situ. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 24(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2019.1568865

Flinterud, G. (2023). ‘Folk’ in the age of algorithms: Theorizing folklore on social media platforms. Folklore, 134(4), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.2023.2233839

Gervás, P., & León, C. (2016). Integrating purpose and revision into a computational model of literary generation. In Creativity and Universality in Language (pp. 105-121). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Haseman, B. (2006). A Manifesto for performative research. Media International Australia, 118(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X0611800113

Herman, C., & Kirkup, G. (2018). Combining feminist pedagogy and transactional distance to create gender-sensitive technology-enhanced learning. In Gender and Distance Education (pp. 10-29). Routledge India.

Hermans, S., Neutens, T., Wyffels, F., & Van Petegem, P. (2024). Empowering vocational students: A research-based framework for computational thinking integration. Education Sciences, 14(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020206

Hutcheon, L. (2006). A Theory of adaptation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203957721

Jia, M., & Shahir, S. (2025). Practice as research methodology in the creative arts: A systematic literature review. Paper Asia, 41(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v41i3b.540

Kämpfe, V. (2023). Performative doing as a living archive of cultural practices. In Dance Practices as Research (pp. 61–94). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30581-8_3

Krajewska, A. (2020). Digitisation of folklore archives: A crisis of tradition or its ‘New Life’ on the internet? The example of Adolf Dygacz’s collection. Kwartalnik Młodych Muzykologów UJ, (46 (3)), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.4467/23537094KMMUJ.20.038.13911

Lombardo, V., Damiano, R., Pizzo, A., & Terzulli, C. (2017). The intangible nature of drama documents. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/3103010.3103019

Malliga, N., & Balamayuranathan, B. (2025). Digital storytelling as a medium for preserving and promoting indigenous cultural identity in digital age. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 12(S3-Apr), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v12iS3-Apr.9054

Nicholls, M. (2021). The adaptive afterlife of texts: Entropy and generative decay. Adaptation, 14(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apab001

Norris, J. (2013). Book review: Method meets art: Arts-based Research practice. Qualitative Health Research, 23(2), 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312468336

Leavy, P. (2017). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. In The Canadian Journal of Action Research (Vol. 18, Number 1). https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v18i1.322

Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263

Soini, K., & Dessein, J. (2016). Culture-sustainability relation: Towards a conceptual framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020167

Sullivan, G. (2005). Art practice as research: inquiry in the visual arts. Sage Publications.

Taylor, D. (2003). The archive and the repertoire. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822385318

Wolgemuth, J. R. (2014). Analyzing for critical resistance in narrative research. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 586–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113501685




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/tlemc.v9i1.17931

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


INDEXED BY:



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statcounter Global Stats - Browser, OS, Search Engine including Mobile  Usage Share

WebAnalytics Made Easy - StatCounter


TLEMC (Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts)
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Siliwangi
Jl. Siliwangi No. 24 Kota Tasikmalaya - 46115
email: tlemc@unsil.ac.id